Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Perl

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 27, 1976No. SPCM 10425Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge FELDER

concurs in part and dissents in part:

I concur with that portion of the opinion which decides that the appellant’s plea of guilty to the charge alleging disrespect to a noncommissioned officer is provident. However, I would invalidate the sentence for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in United States v. Yager, 2 M.J. 484 (A.C.M.R.1975). See United States v. Daigle, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 516, 50 C.M.R. 655, 1 M.J. 139 (1975).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DaigleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. YagerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1975