Legal Opinion

People v. Rojas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1984PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant contends that his motion for dismissal of the assault, second degree, charge should have been granted because the People failed to prove that the victim suffered “substantial pain” within the meaning of subdivision 9 of section 10.00 and subdivision 2 of section 120.05 of the Penal Law. The People rejoin that they are only required to prove that there was more than a technical battery and that, in any event, infliction of an injury by gunshot is sufficient.

The latter argument overlooks the fact…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Philip A.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. JimenezNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. People v. ChiddickNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. People v. GuidiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. People v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API