Legal Opinion

United States v. Ross

U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review

Decided March 6, 1991No. CGCMS 23998, Docket No. 970PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUM, Chief Judge,

This case was referred to the Court for review in accordance with Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866 on 4 February 1991. On 1 March 1991, appellate defense counsel submitted a motion to withdraw the case from appellate review pursuant to Rule 14, Courts of Military Review Rules of Practice and Procedure. The reasons for withdrawal, as set forth in the motion, are as follows:

Appellant will soon reach the expiration of his enlistment and will be foreclosed employment opportunities if he must remain in an appellate leave status without a discharge certificate. Appellant has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. JohnsonU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. HaynesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  2. United States v. RimandoU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  3. United States v. BrightArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. MillerU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  5. United States v. HaynesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API