Central Transport, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On September 10, 1992, this Court heard oral argument on the motion. For the reasons which follow, such motion shall be denied.
I. Background
Plaintiff is a trucking company located in Warren, Michigan. Defendants are the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“Union”), the Teamsters National Freight Industry Negotiating Committee (“Committee”), and several locals of the Union (also “Union”).
On March 31, 1991, the Supplemental Agreement to the Master National Freight Agreement between plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Heussner v. National Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Local 1603 v. Transue & Williams Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adcox v. Teledyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Adcox v. Teledyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Lavery-Madruga v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022