Legal Opinion

Levine v. Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided August 18, 1999No. 04-98-00906-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANGELINI, Justice.

Nature of the case

Ron and Serena Levine appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Bayne, Snell, & Krause, Ltd. Bayne, Snell, & Krause, Ltd. filed suit against the Le-vines to recover attorney’s fees under a contingency fee contract. On appeal, the Levines argue that the court erred in denying their motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment and granting Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.’s second motion for summary judgment. We affirm the judgment.

Factual Background

Bayne, Snell & Krause, P.C. 1 represented the Levines in a DTPA suit alleging that Donald and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Commissioners Court of Titus County v. AganTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. John E. Stockton v. Cotton Bledsoe Tighe & Dawson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
  3. Levine v. Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Levine v. Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API