Levine v. Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANGELINI, Justice.
Nature of the case
Ron and Serena Levine appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Bayne, Snell, & Krause, Ltd. Bayne, Snell, & Krause, Ltd. filed suit against the Le-vines to recover attorney’s fees under a contingency fee contract. On appeal, the Levines argue that the court erred in denying their motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment and granting Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.’s second motion for summary judgment. We affirm the judgment.
Factual Background
Bayne, Snell & Krause, P.C. 1 represented the Levines in a DTPA suit alleging that Donald and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Commissioners Court of Titus County v. AganTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- John E. Stockton v. Cotton Bledsoe Tighe & Dawson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
- Levine v. Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Levine v. Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.