State v. Ralph Vernon G.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1DissentSchultheis, C.J.
(dissenting) — The majority perceives no error in compelling defense counsel to proceed, immediately following his client’s arraignment, with a hearing on the admissibility of critical evidence. This is a denial of due process and the right to effective assistance of counsel. I would reverse the conviction with respect to the charges involving D.G.
The prosecutor’s untimely amendment of the information gave Ralph G. two choices. He could waive his right to a speedy trial on the charges relating to T.W.G. and seek a continuance to enable his attorney to prepare to meet the new charges involving…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HartzogWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Tacoma v. HeaterWashington Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.