Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Ralph Vernon G.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 27, 1998No. 15467-0-IIIPublished

1DissentSchultheis, C.J.

(dissenting) — The majority perceives no error in compelling defense counsel to proceed, immediately following his client’s arraignment, with a hearing on the admissibility of critical evidence. This is a denial of due process and the right to effective assistance of counsel. I would reverse the conviction with respect to the charges involving D.G.

The prosecutor’s untimely amendment of the information gave Ralph G. two choices. He could waive his right to a speedy trial on the charges relating to T.W.G. and seek a continuance to enable his attorney to prepare to meet the new charges involving…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. HartzogWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. City of Tacoma v. HeaterWashington Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API