New Randolph Halsted Currency Exchange, Inc. v. Regent Title Insurance Agency, LLC
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neville
New Randolph Halsted Currency Exchange (New Randolph) cashed a check drawn on a bank account of Regent Title Insurance Agency (Regent). Regent stopped payment on the check. New Randolph sued Regent for payment, claiming that New Randolph qualified as a holder in due course of the check. Following a bench trial, the trial court held that New Randolph was not a holder in due course because the check-cashing transaction raised several warning signals that should have alerted New Randolph to the possibility of fraud. The court entered judgment in favor of Regent.
New Randolph also sought sanctions…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- First National Bank of Blairstown v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Johnson v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Bank of America, N.A. v. 108 N. State Retail LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Peoria Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Jefferson Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Exchange National Bank v. DeGraffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.