Legal Opinion

State v. Noorzai

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 15, 2018No. A159866PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

*433Following the issuance of our opinion in this case, State v. Noorzai , 292 Or. App. 248, 423 P.3d 742 (2018), defendant moved to dismiss his appeal. In its response, the state objected to dismissal; the state alternatively moved on equitable grounds that we vacate our opinion. Defendant does not oppose vacatur. We agree that equitable considerations support vacatur in this case. See Kerr v. Bradbury , 340 Or. 241, 247-50, 131 P.3d 737, adh'd to on recons. , 341 Or. 200, 140 P.3d 1131 (2006). Accordingly, we grant defendant's motion to dismiss his appeal and the state's motion to vacate the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kerr v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Kerr v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. NoorzaiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SassariniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API