Legal Opinion
Kerr v. Bradbury
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 2006No. CC 02C-21814; CA A121744; SC S51503PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.
Jeffrey B. Kerr, Michael Kelley, and Jann Carson (petitioners) seek reconsideration of this court’s decision in Kerr v. Bradbury, 340 Or 241, 131 P3d 737 (2006). We allow their petition for reconsideration and adhere to our decision as issued.
The controversy that gave rise to this case involved a initiative petition approved by the Secretary of State for circulation and signature gathering. Petitioners contended that, as approved, the petition violated the “full text” provision of Article IV, section l(2)(d), 1 of the Oregon Constitution and brought an action against the Secretary of State…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Kerr v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2006
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. HemenwayOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Multnomah County v. MehrweinOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Oregonian Publishing Co., LLC v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Terhune v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Bates v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.