Legal Opinion

Hinds v. United Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 27, 1966No. 18540PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice.

In this action ex delicto, the plaintiff-respondent seeks to recover damages from the defendant-appellant resulting from the alleged negligence of appellant in the handling of applica*288tion by respondent for insurance. The appeal is from an order of the lower court overruling appellant’s demurrer to, and refusing a motion to strike certain portions of the complaint.

Summarized, the facts stated in the complaint are as follows. About January 1961, appellant solicited and obtained from respondent an application for a policy of health and accident insurance which was issued.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keller v. Provident Life & Accident Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. La Tourette v. McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  3. Ward v. Liberty Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  4. Cooper v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  5. Tobacco Redrying Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nichols v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Campus Sweater & Sportswear Co. v. M. B. Kahn Construction Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  3. Riddle-Duckworth, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. Williams v. RiedmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Continental Life & Accident Co. v. SongerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API