Legal Opinion
Reichhold Chem. v. Hartford acc/ind., No. X03-Cv 88 0085884s (Oct. 1, 1998)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided October 1, 1998No. X03-CV 88 0085884S CT Page 12749UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON CHOICE OF LAW
This court has asked the parties in the above-captioned litigation to state their positions regarding the question of which state's law will be applied to issues other than the "notice issue."
Procedural Background
On February 24, 1993, this court, Freed, J., ruled that New York law should apply to the issues of this case. Judge Freed concluded that this would be the result regardless of whether the court adhered to the traditional lex loci approach or theRestatement (Second)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Rapid-American Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Technicon Electronics Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- American Home Products Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Buell Industries, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002