Johnson v. City of Eagan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether a municipality that has recovered, through special assessments, an amount equal to the judicially determined benefit to property but less than the cost of the improvement may recover the shortfall through a fee imposed only on properties that paid judicially reduced assessments. Because we find that such re-coupment constitutes an unconstitutional taking and a subversion of the judicial reduction of the assessment, we reverse the decisions of the lower courts.
In 1992, the City of Eagan (City) authorized a public improvement project…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Buettner v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of BurnsvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Prior Lake American v. MaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Prior Lake American v. MaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002