Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Eagan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 1, 1998No. C2-97-1000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether a municipality that has recovered, through special assessments, an amount equal to the judicially determined benefit to property but less than the cost of the improvement may recover the shortfall through a fee imposed only on properties that paid judicially reduced assessments. Because we find that such re-coupment constitutes an unconstitutional taking and a subversion of the judicial reduction of the assessment, we reverse the decisions of the lower courts.

In 1992, the City of Eagan (City) authorized a public improvement project…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Buettner v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of BurnsvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prior Lake American v. MaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Prior Lake American v. MaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API