Crausby v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
Because of an error in copying the trial court's extension order for filing bills of exception said bills were not considered originally. The error has been corrected by supplemental transcript and the bills will be considered.
The 40th Legislature, Reg. Sess. Chap. 22, page 72, changed the time for holding terms of court in the 72d Judicial District, composed in part of Crosby and Cochran Counties. By inadvertence the act of the Legislature in question provided that one term of court should begin in Crosby County "on the third Monday after the first Monday in September" and might continue in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re PatswaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Brook v. GaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1874
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- McVay v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- McIntosh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.