Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancil*831lary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (LaMarca, J.), dated June 26, 2002, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, (1) directed him to pay to the plaintiff wife nondurational maintenance in the sum of $5,000 per month, retroactive to February 1, 2002, (2) directed him to pay 100% of the present and future educational loans of the parties’ children, (3) directed him to reimburse the plaintiff the sum of $4,000 representing his contribution to a Bar Mitzvah…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loeb v. LoebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Nee v. NeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Palestra v. PalestraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Beece v. BeeceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Cerabona v. CerabonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Thoma v. ThomaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Mesholam v. MesholamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Kessler v. KesslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. C.G. v. F.G.New York Supreme Court · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API