Legal Opinion

Beece v. Beece

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 2001PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Sweeny, J.), entered February 14, 2000, which, inter alia, denied those branches of his motion which were (a) to declare that the plaintiff wife’s attorney was not entitled to collect additional attorney’s fees in the sum of $20,720 from the plaintiff, (b) to direct the plaintiff’s attorney to return to the plaintiff the sum of $7,800 representing money she withdrew from the custodial accounts established for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Poli v. PoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Grossman v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Litman v. LitmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Harrison v. HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mazzone v. MazzoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Chalif v. ChalifAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Frost v. FrostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Heiny v. HeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Sirgant v. SirgantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API