Legal Opinion

People v. Rochen

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 1988No. B027372PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Defendant and appellant Nell Marie Rochen (Rochen) appeals a judgment rendered upon a guilty plea after denial of her motion to suppress. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5.) 1

Because the officer’s affidavit showed sufficient corroboration of the confidential informant to support the issuance of the search warrant, the judgment is affirmed.

Factual and Procedural Background

The subject affidavit provided in relevant part: In early May 1986, the affiant was contacted by a confidential informant (Cl), who was a PCP user. The Cl knew a woman by the name of Nellie who was selling PCP from her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. People v. KurlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. BroomeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. LuttenbergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. McNabbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. People v. LuttenbergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. TuadlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. TuadlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API