Legal Opinion

People v. Conrad

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1954No. Crim. 2996PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Appellant and one Lewis were tried jointly before the court without a jury on a charge of burglary. Both defendants were also charged with, and admitted, a prior .felony conviction. The trial court found appellant guilty and defendant Lewis not guilty. The appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial: Appellant raises two grounds for a reversal of the judgment: (1) that the evidence is insufficient, and (2) that Lewis’s testimony lacks proper corroboration.

The appellant was an employee of a construction firm working under a building contract. The company maintained a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. LimaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. BurnessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. People v. CitrinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API