People v. Conrad
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Appellant and one Lewis were tried jointly before the court without a jury on a charge of burglary. Both defendants were also charged with, and admitted, a prior .felony conviction. The trial court found appellant guilty and defendant Lewis not guilty. The appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial: Appellant raises two grounds for a reversal of the judgment: (1) that the evidence is insufficient, and (2) that Lewis’s testimony lacks proper corroboration.
The appellant was an employee of a construction firm working under a building contract. The company maintained a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. LimaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. BurnessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- People v. CitrinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.