Mance v. Mercedes-Benz USA
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Demetrius Manee bought a new Mercedes-Benz automobile. As it turns out, the car had many problems, so, after numerous failed attempts to fix it, Mr. Manee sued Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“Mercedes-Benz”), the car’s manufacturer, for violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Cal. Civ.Code §§ 1790, et seq., California’s Lemon Law. Mercedes-Benz moved to compel Mr. Manee to arbitrate his claims pursuant to an arbitration clause found in the contract he signed when…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kettler International, Inc. v. Starbucks Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Burgoon v. Narconon of Northern CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Wallace v. Red Bull Distributing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
- Ballesteros v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Cohen v. CBR Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.