State v. Ervin

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant contends in his first assignment of error that the court erred in allowing Pressgrove to identify him at trial for the reason that the lineup procedures employed were im-permissibly suggestive. We find no merit in the assignment.

The testimony of Pressgrove, on voir dire, was to the following effect: Oh the day in question Pressgrove was an employee of the City of Charlotte, working as a water department serviceman. At the time of the alleged robbery, around 1:30 p.m., he was parked and was sitting in his truck. Defendant and another individual came up to Pressgrove and…