State v. Jordan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
In his brief defendant specifically abandons his assignments of error numbered one and three, and we, therefore, do not consider them here. Rule 28, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure.
By his second assignment of error defendant argues that the trial court erred by overruling his general objections to the in-court identifications of defendant by State’s witnesses Hilda Gray and Emma Jones, and by denying his motion to strike the testimony of witness Gray. In conjunction with this argument, he contends that the trial court erred by failing to hold a voir dire examination of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Couch v. Private Diagnostic ClinicCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Cornelius v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. PennellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. SummeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.