Legal Opinion

State v. Beck.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 24, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

INDICTMENT for larceny against Lee Beck, beard by Judge R. B. Peebles and a jury, at tbe February Term, 1906, of tbe Superior Court of Forsyth. From a verdict of guilty and a judgment tbereon, tbe defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

The defendant is indicted for tbe larceny of thirty pounds of brass railing attached partly to tbe freehold and partly to an engine in an ice plant, the engine being attached to tbe freehold.

Eevisal, section 3511, provides, “If any person not being tbe present owner or bona fide claimant thereof shall wilfully and unlawfully enter upon tbe lands of another and carry off, or be engaged in carrying off any wood or other kind of property whatsoever, growing or being tbereon * * * if tbe act is done with felonious intent, shall' be guilty of larceny * * * if not done with such intent he shall be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. State v. . VosburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. State v. . GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. State v. . BurtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API