Legal Opinion

Espenlaub v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1936No. 26,562PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoll, J.

The appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of first degree rape. To this charge he entered a plea of not guilty. Trial was had and a verdict returned finding appellant guilty of assault and battery with intent to commit a felony, to wit, rape. Over a motion for a new trial, the court rendered judgment on the verdict, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The only error assigned by appellant is the overruling of his motion for a new trial.

Appellant’s first contention under his motion for a new trial is that the verdict of the jury is contrary to law and that the verdict of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Framingham Gas, Fuel & Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Shears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Griebel v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Bigler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Marts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. City of Shelbyville v. MORTON, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Loehr v. National Security Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API