Taylor v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Knox Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellant was convicted of the crime of rape upon the person of Jane Taylor, a child nine years of age. It is contended by his counsel that the verdict is not .supported because there is no evidence of penetration.
*280Our statute provides that “ In prosecutions for the offenceof rape, proof of penetration shall be sufficient evidence of the commission of the offence.” R. S. 1881, section 1806.. Under this statute, however it may have been at common, law, the slightest penetration of the genital organ of the male into that of the female is sufficient, the other elements of the crime being…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brauer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- State v. TarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nickels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- State v. CarnagySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Weaver v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- Allbritten v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.