Legal Opinion
Clorox Co. v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 9, 2009No. 2:09-mj-00408PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge.
On April 21, 2009, plaintiff The Clorox Company (“Clorox”) filed a complaint in this district seeking injunctive relief against defendant S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (“SCJ”) pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 (Dock et # 1). In the complaint, Clorox alleges that SCJ is threatening to misappropriate and may have already misappropriated Clorox’s trade secrets by hiring away a Clorox executive, in violation of Wisconsin’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Wis. Stat. § 134.90. This case comes before the court under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 on the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Girl Scouts of Manitou Council, Inc. v. Girl Scouts of United States of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- CDW LLC v. NETech Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2010
- Lasen, Inc. v. TadjikovNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- SJ Properties Suites v. Specialty Finance Group, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012
- Edifecs Inc. v. Tibco Software Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
- Democratic National Committee v. Bostelmann, MargeDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.