Legal Opinion

Wallace v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 15, 1911No. 1349PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of adultery with Charity Johnson by means of habitual carnal intercourse without living together.

It is contended that the evidence is not sufficient to support the conviction. The evidence is to the effect that appellant had the first act of intercourse with the witness Charity Johnson about the first day of January, and between that time and the 10th of March, which she sajrs was the last act, appellant had intercourse with her five or six times, no two of which were closer together than alb out two weeks, and others as far as three weeks…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  2. Hilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Christian v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Quinn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RochaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1929
  2. Cordill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Hafley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Krolczyk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API