Penny v. City of Durham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
A demurrer admits, for the purpose of testing the pleadings, the truth of factual averments properly .alleged and such relevant inferences of fact as may be deduced therefrom, but it does not admit any legal inferences or conclusions of law asserted by the pleader. Bailey v. McGill, 247 N.C. 286, 100 S. E. 2d 860.
In the court below the plaintiffs based their case upon the alleged illegality of the rezoning ordinance of 2 December, 1957. As set out in the judgment appealed from, plaintiffs assigned as the sole ground for their contention that said ordinance is illegal “that their property is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Olsen v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Bailey v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- In Re W. P. Rose Builders Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Clark v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Morris Communications Corp. v. City of Bessemer City Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
- Helms v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Heaton v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- In Re MarkhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Armstrong v. McInnisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.