Legal Opinion

Eley v. Miller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action to recover damages on account of the alleged failure of the defendant to convey 1.91 acres of land. The contract of sale and the deed executed by the defendant vendor includes the above tract together with other land owned by defendant, but it is conceded that title to the 1.91 acres is vested in third parties. Plaintiff asserts that, by reason of this alleged breach of warranty, he has been damaged in the sum of $1,750.

Defendant, by answer in the nature of a cross-bill in equity, seeks reformation of the contract and deed on the ground of mutual mistake,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Miller v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kontz v. B. P. John Furniture Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Weatherford v. WEATHERFORDOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Shoulderblade v. OsbornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Marshall v. City of YachatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Roesch v. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API