Baytide Petroleum, Inc. v. Continental Resources, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WATT, J.:
{1 We granted certiorari to consider an issue of first impression: whether an oil and gas lease sought to be terminated for failure to produce in paying quantities during the secondary term remains effective until the lease has been judicially cancelled? We hold that it is not the court order which terminates the lease. Rather, it is the failure to produce in paying quantities under the ha-bendum clause during the lease's secondary term. In the instant cause, the lease terminated by its own terms before the Alfalfa County court issued its order. 1
12 Our determination that the date of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Voiles v. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Stewart v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Anthis v. Sullivan Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Townsend v. Creekmore-Rooney CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Hunter v. ClarksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Browne v. Artex Oil Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- Concorde Resources Corp. v. Williams Production Mid-Continent Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.