Swengel v. Bruun
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEand, J.
The defendant, C. D. Bruun, employed the defendant, Multnomah Eealty Brokers, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the broker, as sales agent to obtain purchasers for lots owned by him in Parkhill Addition to the city of Portland under a contract which provided that the broker should collect from such purchasers and retain as commission 30 per cent of the sales price of each lot sold, after which Brunn should enter into a written contract to convey the lot upon payment to him by the purchaser of the balance of the purchase price. Daly, an employee of the broker, sold one of said lots to plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. GoodOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Swengel v. BruunOregon Supreme Court · 1931