Legal Opinion · Dissent

Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Tanager Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 2, 1950Published

1DissentVan Voorhis, J.

I dissent with respect to the interest falling due from January 1, 1933, to July 1, 1940, which is barred by the Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prac. Act, § 47-a) and vote for a declaratory judgment entitling defendant to a satisfaction of the mortgage without payment of the disputed unpaid interest between those dates.

The continuance of a mortgage of record as a cloud upon title, after it can no longer be foreclosed, imparts to it an enforeibility which the Statute of Limitations was designed to take away. Such a method of enforcement is not a remedy recognized by law, but is made possible…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lazarus v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Lorillard v. . ClydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Van Keuren v. . ParmeleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  4. Fisher v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Union Trust Co. v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API