Legal Opinion
Boyle v. Anderson
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 12, 1994No. Civ. 3-93-359PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAGNUSON, District Judge..
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Asserting that there are no genuine issues of material fact, Plaintiffs move for summary judgment and ask this Court for a permanent injunction barring the State of Minnesota from enforcing certain provisions of Minnesota statutes with respect to Plaintiffs. Defendants agree that there are no genuine issues of material fact in this matter and request that summary judgment be granted in favor of Defendants. For the following reasons, the Court enters…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boyle v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Boyle v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- AMERIND RISK MANAGEMENT CORP. v. MalaterreDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2008
- Gustafson v. PoitraDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2009