Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Benham

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1925No. 24,592PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The suit is on two promissory notes. A demurrer to the answer was sustained and defendant appeals.

The answer admitted the signing and delivery of the notes, and that no part had been paid, although payment had been demanded. Then, by way of defense, it is alleged that the notes were signed and left with plaintiff in connection with the liquidation of a business transaction in which plaintiff and defendant should endeavor to sell certain lands at a profit, deducting carrying charges and selling expenses, and in event there were cash profits from the transaction then the notes should become due…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawkes v. LackeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Clinch Valley Coal & Iron Co. ex rel. Grove v. WillingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Fritz v. FritzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Brintnall v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  5. American Fruit Product Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. ElkinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Karger v. WangerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Gartner v. GartnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Markville State Bank v. SteinbringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Searing v. HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API