Arthur v. Pierre Limited
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray
¶1 Amber K. Arthur (Arthur) appeals from the judgment entered by the Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Carbon County, on its order granting summary judgment to Defendants as to all six claims raised in Arthur’s complaint. We affirm.
¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:
¶3 1. Did the District Court err in granting summary judgment to the Defendants on five of Arthur’s claims based on its determination that the claims were precluded by the exclusive remedy provision of the Montana Human Rights Act?
¶4 2. Did the District Court err in granting summary judgment to the Defendants on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Brenda L. BROCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Henricksen v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Harrison v. ChanceMontana Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hughes v. LynchMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Schoof v. NesbitMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Saucier Ex Rel. Mallory v. McDonald's Restaurants of Montana, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
- BNSF Railway Co. v. CringleMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Rolison v. Bozeman Deaconess Health Services, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.