Legal Opinion

Floyd Weddle v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 2013No. 73A01-1209-CR-452PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

In this case, the appellant-defendant Floyd Weddle challenges the trial court’s admission of certain evidence after police officers conducted a protective sweep of his residence and subsequently searched the premises following the issuance of a search warrant. Weddle claims that the scope of the protective sweep violated both the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution because the allegedly impermissible broad protective sweep of the residence led to the police officers’ discovery of drugs and paraphernalia.

We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. United States v. Tyrond BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Cole v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Trotter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mario Watkins v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Floyd Weddle v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Gary Tindall v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Kenneth Saylor v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Marion Watkins v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API