Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Walsh v. Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1992No. 92-1859PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

For the reasons that follow we allow the writ.

Relator and respondent have agreed to the following facts:(1) that relator has resided in Rome Township, Ashtabula County, since April 1990;(2) that her residence is within the jurisdiction of the office she seeks;(3) that on July 31, 1992, relator filed a form with respondent changing her voter registration from her prior residence in Lake County to her current residence in Ashtabula County;(4) that relator’s Lake County registration was in effect since 1983 and was uncancelled at the time she filed the change of residence form;

*199(5) that relator…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gazan v. HeerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. In re Protest Filed with the Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Schenck v. ShattuckOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State, Ex Rel. Latimer v. LeonardOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Smith, a Taxpayer v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Colvin v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Morris v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State ex rel. O'Neill v. Athens Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State ex rel. Markulin v. Ashtabula County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Colvin v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API