Legal Opinion

Charleston Waterkeeper v. Frontier Logistics LP

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided December 14, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01089Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION CHARLESTON WATERKEEPER and ) SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL ) CONSERVATION LEAGUE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 2:20-cv-1089-DCN vs. ) ) ORDER FRONTIER LOGISTICS, L.P., ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________________) This matter is before the court on nonparty South Carolina State Ports Authority’s (“the Ports Authority”) motion to stay, ECF No. 42. For the reasons that follow, the court denies the motion. I. BACKGROUND This is an action filed pursuant to the citizen-suit provisions of the Resource…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API