Legal Opinion
United States v. Arcuri
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 27, 1968No. 66 CR 454PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEINSTEIN, District Judge.
Defendants moved during trial and after being found guilty to dismiss the indictment on the ground that it was based purely on hearsay. For the reasons indicated below their motions are denied.
At the trial, the main evidence against the defendants was the testimony of a group of Special Agents of the Treasury Department. They were on the scene when defendants passed a large number of counterfeit bills.
Despite the fact that more than a half dozen Special Agents participated in the investigation and arrest, a government agent without any direct…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. BorelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Charles Estepa and Francis VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Paul F. GregorioCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Nelson CruzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Philip Arcuri and Alfred John CimeiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Larry Dean ShortCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.