Legal Opinion
Golay v. Loomis
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1990No. 18303Published
1Opinion of the Court
797 P.2d 95 (1990)
118 Idaho 387
Byrd GOLAY, dba Golay Masonry, Plaintiff-respondent,
v.
George A. LOOMIS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 18303.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
July 30, 1990.
Roark, Donovan, Praggastis, Rivers & Phillips, Hailey, for defendant-appellant. Kathleen E. Rivers argued, Hailey.
Decker & Hollifield, Twin Falls, for plaintiff-respondent. William R. Hollifield, argued, Twin Falls.
BAKES, Chief Justice.
This case is before us on a petition for review from the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals reversed a district court appellate decision which had upheld a magistrate's decision granting…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Esther HAYDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PLEASANT, TEXAS, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Mitchell v. SiqueirosIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Avondale on Hayden, Inc. v. HallIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Julie Thomas v. Computax CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.