Legal Opinion

Parker Appliance Co. v. Co-Operative MacHinery Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1924No. 18196PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The original action in this case was an equitable one to foreclose a lien arising by reason of a contract of conditional sale, among the provisions of which was contained a waiver of Section 8570, General Code.

The paramount question for determination is whether the vendor of chattel property claiming to' have a lien, by reason of a conditional contract of sale, may maintain a suit in foreclosure in a court of equity without complying with the terms of Section 8570, General Code.

It is to be noted that this is not an action at law for judgment on notes given at the time of the execution of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Bettman-Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  2. In re National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  3. Burroughs Adding Mach. Co. v. DialCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Cash Register Co. v. NessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Franklin Fire Insurance v. BollingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  3. Patterson v. National Cash Register Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. C.I.T. Corporation v. MorseOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API