Abbondondolo v. Mealing
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. It appears that the plaintiff and the defendant-appellant were coemployees and that at the time of the accident they were engaged in their common employment. In his answer as amended at the trial the defendant alleged as a separate defense that if the accident happened it arose out of and in the course of the appealing defendant’s common employment with plaintiff; that the town had duly complied with the provisions of the Compensation Law by securing to its employees workmen’s compensation, and that the exclusive…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Kowcun v. BybeeOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Caulfield v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Pantolo v. LaneNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Puccio v. CarrNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Schwartz v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.