Mobile O.R. Co. v. Tays
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.
The Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company prosecutes an appeal from a final decree of the chancery court of Prentiss county granting complainant, A. A. Tays, a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company, “from further filling up trestle No. 303-68, or any part thereof.”
Tays exhibited his bill, alleging that he was owner of one hundred twenty-eight acres of land lying west of the Mobile & Ohio Railroad, that there was a natural Watercourse running through said land, and that near the northeast corner of his land there was a long railroad trestle under the track of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sinai v. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railway Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1893
- Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
- Illinois Central Railroad v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. New Orleans Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Jones v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Columbus & G. Ry. Co. v. TaylorMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
- Miller v. ErvinMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
- Louisville N.R. Co. v. CapdeponMississippi Supreme Court · 1941