Legal Opinion

Mobile O.R. Co. v. Tays

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1926No. 25419PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

The Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company prosecutes an appeal from a final decree of the chancery court of Prentiss county granting complainant, A. A. Tays, a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company, “from further filling up trestle No. 303-68, or any part thereof.”

Tays exhibited his bill, alleging that he was owner of one hundred twenty-eight acres of land lying west of the Mobile & Ohio Railroad, that there was a natural Watercourse running through said land, and that near the northeast corner of his land there was a long railroad trestle under the track of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sinai v. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railway Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State v. New Orleans Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  5. Jones v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Columbus & G. Ry. Co. v. TaylorMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Miller v. ErvinMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Louisville N.R. Co. v. CapdeponMississippi Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API