Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hutton v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 28, 1995No. 151Published

1ConcurrenceRodowsky, Judge

I join in the judgment of the Court because I agree that the rule of Bohnert v. State, 312 Md. 266, 539 A.2d 657 (1988), was *508violated. The State asked Dr. Davis, “How do you assess credibility?” Without specific objection, she opined that the victim could not in any way have faked the consequences of the abuse. By concurring, I give the petitioner the benefit of the doubt as to preservation both at trial, through a broad continuing objection, and in this Court, through a broad certiorari petition.

I write separately, however, because I believe that a diagnosis of PTSD is relevant to whether…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. Edward Charles L.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United States v. Harvey M. RenvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API