Legal Opinion

Brown v. Gatti

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 2006No. CC 0002-01586; CA A115927; SC S51981PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

Plaintiffs, Timothy M. Brown, M.D. (Brown), and Timothy M. Brown, M.D., P.C. (collectively, Brown plaintiffs), filed a defamation action against the following defendants: (1) Daniel J. Gatti (Gatti), who is a lawyer; (2) Gatti, Gatti, Maier, Krueger & Associates; Gatti, Gatti, Maier, Krueger, Sayer & Associates; and Gatti & Gatti, P.C. (we refer to Gatti and his firms collectively as Gatti defendants); 1 and (3) Marie Nolan. 2 The trial court granted summary judgment for Gatti defendants. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed. Brown v. Gatti, 195 Or App 695, 99 P3d 299 (2004). We allowed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Peck v. Coos Bay Times Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hinkle v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Reesman v. HighfillOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Beecher v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Neumann v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Gail Bierman and Beth Weier v. Scott Weier and Author Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. Neumann v. LilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Elizabeth Retail Properties LLC v. Keybank National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  5. Lowell v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 2022

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API