Legal Opinion
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 1, 1998No. 1:97-cv-12724PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LASKER, District Judge.
On June 25, 1997, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “the Commission”) issued, pursuant to the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717 et seq., a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (the “Certificate”) to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company. Tennessee is a company engaged primarily in the business of transporting, via pipeline, natural gas and its by products The Certificate authorizes Tennessee to construct, install, operate, and maintain a 7.54 mile extension of its existing pipeline in the Town of Saugus, to an existing natural…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Federal Power Commission v. Sunray DX Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Williams Natural Gas Co. v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Transcon. Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Certain EasementsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. New England PowerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Kansas Pipeline Co. v. 200 Foot by 250 Foot Piece of LandDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Portland Natural Gas Transmission System v. 4.83 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C. v. 529.42 Acres of LandDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.