L. T. Stanley Estate v. First Nat. Bank of Cooper
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LEVY, X
(after stating-the case as above). Appellant’s first and second propositions pi’esent, in effect, for determination, the priority of claim to the land between the bank and the administrator and guardian. The appellant contends that there was error in the judgment of the district court in foreclosing the attachment lien claimed by the bank, because (1) the minor children of L. T. Stanley, deceased, were legally entitled to take the land in suit as homestead or as property free from all claims of creditors, including the attachment lien, and (2) the order of the probate court setting…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zwernemann v. RosenbergTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Childers v. D. J. Henderson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
- Roots v. Robertson, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Cameron v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Lacy v. Lockett, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Panhandle Const. Co. v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- George v. First Nat. Bank of TuliaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Massey v. Citizens' Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930