Legal Opinion
Wilkins v. City of Oakland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 20, 2003No. 03-15086PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Defendants-Appellants Tim Scarrott and Andrew Koponen, Police Officers for the City of Oakland (“Scarrott and Kopo-nen,” or “the officers”), raise several issues on appeal. We conclude that we have jurisdiction to consider only the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity. We affirm.
JURISDICTION
This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 over an interlocutory appeal where the ground for the motion in question is qualified immunity. Jeffers v. Gomez, 267 F.3d 895, 903 (9th Cir.2001) (per…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- Morgan v. MorgensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Torres v. City of MaderaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Kennedy v. City of RidgefieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Genzler v. LonganbachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Bingue v. PrunchakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.