Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Rice

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1913No. Civ. No. 1369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action whereby plaintiff seeks to recover from defendant the sum of $636.75 for materials used and money expended for labor performed in the construction of a building at the special instance and request of defendant. The allegations of the complaint were denied.

Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff.

Some time after the commencement of the action, in April, 1911, plaintiff, in response to a demand therefor by defendant, delivered to him a bill of particulars of the account, consisting of several hundred items, upon which the action was based. At the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Landis v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Edelman v. McDonellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Taylor v. TuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  4. Creamer & Graham v. ShannonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  5. Moody v. J. M. Roberts & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1866

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Porter v. Northern Fire & Marine InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Stenseth v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Ben-Hur Manufacturing Co. v. Empire FactorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API