Legal Opinion

Dawley v. City of Norfolk, Virginia

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 26, 1958No. Civ. A. 2405PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge.

In this action by way of declaratory judgment, plaintiff, a Negro attorney at law practicing in the City of Norfolk, Virginia, seeks a mandatory injunction against the defendants to require them to remove the word “Colored” from the doors of certain rest rooms in a courthouse building occupied and used exclusively by four state courts and the judges thereof. Plaintiff concedes that the rest rooms are equal in every respect. The lettering on the doors of the four rest rooms are indicated respectively as follows:

“White Women — Rest Room”
“Colored Women — Rest…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Montgomery, Alabama v. Georgia Theresa GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Clark v. ThompsonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1962
  3. Lipsett v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  4. Bd. of Supervisors v. Com. of AccountsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  5. Clarence H. Seniors v. Luke Arnold and William B. HartsfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API