Legal Opinion

In re September 11 Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 31, 2006No. Nos. 21 MC 97(AKH), 21 MC 101(AKH)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*165 OPINION AND ORDER REGULATING TESTIMONY AT DEPOSITIONS WHEN ANSWERS MIGHT CONTAIN SSI

HELLERSTEIN, District Judge.

I write to rule on a strange and significant phenomenon. The Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”), having first intervened in these actions to protect Sensitive Security Information (“SSI”), declines to at*166tend noticed depositions of the airline defendants, where testimony is likely to contain such information. Instead, TSA seeks to impose on defendants’ counsel the obligation to object and prevent answers that might disclose SSI. Counsel for defendants, believing that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richard Merritt & Mary-Jo Merritt v. Shuttle, Inc., U.S. Airways Inc., Terry v. Hallcom, Steven K. Wilson, & United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. Gilmore v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. In Re September 11 LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. Colaio v. FeinbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. Chowdhury v. Northwest Airlines Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pappas v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. Skurow v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. In Re September 11 LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. Nathaniel Hampton v. Chad WolfDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API