Legal Opinion
Gilmore v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 25, 2006No. 04-15736PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAEZ, Circuit Judge.
John Gilmore (“Gilmore”) sued Southwest Airlines and the United States Attorney General, Alberto R. Gonzales, among other defendants, 1 alleging that the enactment and enforcement of the Government’s civilian airline passenger identification policy is unconstitutional. The identification policy requires airline passengers to present identification to airline personnel before boarding or be subjected to a search that is more exacting than the routine search that passengers who present identification encounter. Gilmore alleges that when he refused to present identification…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Safe Extensions, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Koutny v. MartinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Faisal Nabin Kashem v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Bingham v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.